.NTczMQ.Mzc3MA: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "which in the Dulwich picture is complete; this is a proof that when this copy was made the original had not been pierced. Nothing is easier than to place this picture in its p...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
which in the Dulwich picture is complete; this is a proof that when this copy was made the original had not been pierced. | which in the Dulwich picture is complete; this is a proof that when this copy was made the original had not been pierced. | ||
Nothing is easier than to place this picture in its proper place in chronological order. Painted in the year 1644, in the month of June, it is posterior to "Las | Nothing is easier than to place this picture in its proper place in chronological order. Painted in the year 1644, in the month of June, it is posterior to "Las Lauzas"; to "Los Retratos Ecuestres" and to "Los Cazadores" in the Prado Museum; it is nearly contemporaneous of the "Dama del Abanico" of the Wallace Collection, which, I think, is the portrait of Francisca, daughter of the painter. | ||
[102] |
Revision as of 18:18, 14 December 2020
which in the Dulwich picture is complete; this is a proof that when this copy was made the original had not been pierced. Nothing is easier than to place this picture in its proper place in chronological order. Painted in the year 1644, in the month of June, it is posterior to "Las Lauzas"; to "Los Retratos Ecuestres" and to "Los Cazadores" in the Prado Museum; it is nearly contemporaneous of the "Dama del Abanico" of the Wallace Collection, which, I think, is the portrait of Francisca, daughter of the painter.
[102]